Data Formats Quicktime supports a wide variety of standard video, audio and still image formats, including the Quicktime Movie format.QuickTime 6 was initially available for Mac OS 8.6 9.x, Mac OS X (10.1.5 minimum), and Windows 98, Me, 2000, and XP. The article starts off with the usual slightly complaining on how Microsoft copied Apple and goes on comparing Feature By Feature and what is bad about Vista compared to OSX.Quicktime is available for Windows and Mac (OS 9/X). Works on: Windows 95 / Windows 98 / Windows 2000 / Windows XP / Windows Vista / Windows Vista x64 / Windows XP x64 / Windows ME / Windows NT 4.0 / Windows 7 / Windows 7 x64 / Windows 8 / Windows Server 2003 x64. Date Released: Jul 15, 2002. QuickTime 5.0.5 0 out of 5 based on 0 ratings.Online resources and introduced a QuickTime-like metallic appearance.The XLR8 InterView 3.0 USB video capture, allows easy, super-quality 1/4 screen, video capture from any video device into Apple QuickTime. Regardless, I’ve stopped reading on page 3.Mac OS 9 is the ninth major release of Apples classic Mac OS operating system which was. QuickTime 6 for Mac OS continued on the 6.0.x path, eventually stopping with version 6.0.3.Apple is known for it’s slick design and we shouldn’t be surprised about Microsoft trying to steal a piece of the pie.
So I expected they would go over board and implement such annoying features.HardCore Mac still has a pretty comprehensive selection of OS 9 (and other Mac OS back to System 7.5) CDs (or floppies for older system version), but their prices are very high. Microsoft was and is still known for security vulnerabilities. It also supports AppleScript automation and multiple devices on the same system - I’m a mac user and don’t use any Microsoft products, however we MAC users might have to accept that a comparable feature might act or is implemented differently on alternative OS’s. I think this really underscores the difference between Windows and Mac users. Hehehe this might take while.I noticed that this guy goes on endless about the look of the two operating system, and actually devotes the majority of the article to the subject. The average user will be amazed by it’s eye candy and Microsoft will be laughing by looking at their bank account numbers.I believe in order for us to form an opinion on “How good Vista really is” it needs to be released to the general public and get statistics how well it has been accepted and performs doing the day to day tasks. Microsoft will get flamend for a little while (MS Zune MP3 player, same situation) because of the similarities of the two OS’s but in the end it has to be accepted by 80%-90% of the IT market. 149.99.Going back to the Aqua-Aero. Mac OS 9.0.4 full installation CD, in sleeve. But as long as they ain’t making Directory Opus and about a dozen other apps for Mac, Windows will be my primary OS. That in itself is not a bad thing, but some of us have our priorities in different places.What better way to show that when you buy a Mac you get two computers in one?I suppose if you’re only booting into Windows every once in awhile to play the occassional game and using OSX the majority of the time, this might optimal. Mac users place sooooooo much emphasis on looks. It is a whole different story. So basically for the most commonly used OS there are two theming options: WindowBlinds – an comercial product that has been around since win98 days, and upxThemePatcher – an hack of the original XP theming engine to open it up to 3rd party Themes.LiteStep is an shell replacement that does no actually themeing… windows looks the same apart from the desktop.That doesn’t imply the majority or even many windows user use them.I wouldn’t compare Linux Window managers, GUI librarys or DEs to themes. ObjectDesktop in more or less just an addition to WindowBlinds, it is not a theming engine. That is not quite appropriate.How about comparing professional Mac users with professional Windows users who know how much trouble all this eyecandy trash can bring you after the next patchday. But anyway, even with the dinosaur, Mac users were happy all along. Not that anyone we know of does that. I’m glad they took their time and didn’t just rush headlong into the first idea they had ( ) and foist it upon the users whether it worked or not. Apple was aware of this at least as far back as OS7. The reson there are many different GUIs for Linux is more often caused by either technological resons or by licencensing issues, not by “this is prettyer than that”.Technologically, OS9 was a dinosaur. It’s not the same as invention. There’s a reason the word exists. Execution outweighs theory.Check the meaning of the word innovation. They innovated the computer with no floppy drive and using universal buses for all peripherals, the trappings of a fully modern computer that the PC world still hasn’t caught up to. Apple took that and made it cleaner and more powerful. Get Info / Properties type windows have been around for a good long while. Same thing with the Inspector. They innovated the universal menu bar out of the pre-existing menu bar concept and the need to eliminate redundancy and clutter. By introducing new methods, ideas, or productsApple innovated their dock out of the statically available nature of a taskbar, the advanced functionality of NeXT, and the simplicity of one click. Get darkest dungeon for free for macThey’re really more like Ford.I agree, Fanboys are a pain. No one said they were Edison. I can think of a bunch of other innovations, like the way Preview works, but they’re harder to explain in such simple terms.So yeah, citing things Apple gets credit for innovating that they didn’t actually invent is meaningless. They took widgets and innovated them into something unobtrusively convenient. They’ve taken fast search and innovated it to something so straightforward it actually replaces file browsing. I would assume you believe that Alexander Graham Bell invented the telephone.See the truth: Apple had memory protection and preemptive Multitasking in 2000. Invention and innovation are never simply one man, one concept. Company events preaching to the choirs. All that 16bit legacy code for (marginal) “backwards compatibility”. The awesome advanced technology that MS had over Apple, which was one of the primary reasons for Windows BSOD fame. The preemptive multitasking argument hung around for years. If we are truly honest about it, Vista is trying to make a “silk purse from a sows ear”.“Gentleman, start your Photocopiers” is a line from an Apple ad for the latest OS X version.>Invention and innovation are never simply one man, one concept.That’s exactly what i was trying to say. We are being sold a bill of goods. More intrusive dialogs with some change text. I wasn’t getting at Microsoft here though. Win 9x only had cooperative Multitasking and no memory protecttion. I would even go so far to say that Apple didn’t even improved them.>The awesome advanced technology that MS had over Apple, which was one of the primary reasons for Windows BSOD fame.Preemptive Multitasking was around in Windows NT, which run very stable. Everything was around before. None of the features that the almighty OS X has and Vista copied from OS X were invented by Apple. Even Win 2000 was running extremly stable if you worked with it. You probably had defect hardware, but on normal Working hardware XP runs very stable without any SPs… the SPs are around because of security problems, not stability issues. The Virtual Memory system in pre OS X was so incredibly crappy that we had stuffed our OS 8 Macs so full of Ram that they never needed to page out, because they would crash very often if they did.>Stability was in no way a reality for Windows until XP SP2 (what year was that?)That’s not true. Quicktime 9 Drivers Could PrettyWithout memory protection every error you do with pointers or direct handling of memory leads to an os crash (and you make such mistakes from time to time if you are not an alien), instead of an app crash. Windows NT 4.0 already was quite rock-solid… and that was mid 90s.Speaking as a programer, the minimum i expect from an os is memory protection. That was because the Graphicsdrivers could pretty much bypass everything. Just stop pretending that everyone copys from Apple. Much of those new features are obvious ideas and much have been around for years. Nothing it has to offer wasn’t around before it, not even the tiny idea of the color flashing Window buttons. But that is also true for OS X. I didn’t state there where new, innovative features in Vista. Thank god there where some decent operating systems around that time as well.>Now what real innovations will we have when Vista is finally releasedProbably none.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorChristi ArchivesCategories |